Comments on: Category 7: The End of the World http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/category-7-the-end-of-the-world/ 2012, December 21 2012, Natural Disasters News, 2012 End Of The World, 2012 Movies Mon, 28 Jun 2010 01:11:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Ravi http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/category-7-the-end-of-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-74 Ravi Tue, 09 Feb 2010 08:42:08 +0000 http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/category-7-the-end-of-the-world/#comment-74 LOL.. When will this ever end...? Category 1, then 2, 3,4,5,6 and now 7..? <br />I wonder what kind of "super-duper" storms we will see in Category 8, 9, 10... 34... 98. <br /> <br />Well at least they picked a category number for the movie title.. so they can go on for ever. Imagine if they had titles like "Storm", "Super storm".. "super-duper storm"... "zzuper storm".. "so strong we dont have a name for it storm" (I might actually have watched the last one.. lol) Rating: 2 / 5 LOL.. When will this ever end…? Category 1, then 2, 3,4,5,6 and now 7..?

I wonder what kind of “super-duper” storms we will see in Category 8, 9, 10… 34… 98.

Well at least they picked a category number for the movie title.. so they can go on for ever. Imagine if they had titles like “Storm”, “Super storm”.. “super-duper storm”… “zzuper storm”.. “so strong we dont have a name for it storm” (I might actually have watched the last one.. lol)
Rating: 2 / 5

]]> By: Gregory J. Burton http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/category-7-the-end-of-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-73 Gregory J. Burton Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:38:46 +0000 http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/category-7-the-end-of-the-world/#comment-73 THIS IS A WATCHABLE MOVIE, BUT NOT QUITE WORTH WHAT I PAID FOR IT. IT IS A LITTLE BETTER THAN CATAGORY 6. SPECIAL EFFECTS WERE A LITTLE BIT BETTER, BUT I NOTICED THE SAME SHOTS AS WERE IN CATAGORY 6. THIS KIND OF RUINED IT. THE SPECIAL EFFECTS WERE BETTER, BUT STILL "CHEESY" BY TODAY'S STANDARDS LIKE THE NEWEST RELEASE OF KING KONG, WHICH BOASTS SOME AWESOME SPECIAL EFFECTS. I FEEL TWISTER HAS BETTER SPECIAL EFFECTS AS FAR AS TONADOES GO. THIS MOVIE DOES SHOW BETTER ACTING, AND A LITTLE MORE IN THE LINE OF NOTEWORTHY ACTORS LIKE ROBERT WAGONER, AND RANDY QUAID. IT'S A GOOD MOVIE, BUT FALLS SHORT OF "THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW". I'VE SEEN THE PREVIEWS OF REMAKES OF THE CLASSIC DISASTER MOVIES, AND THEY LOOK INTERESTING. THIS MOVIE IS ENTERTAINING, AND IF YOU ARE A DISASTER FLICK FAN, GO FOR IT!!! Rating: 3 / 5 THIS IS A WATCHABLE MOVIE, BUT NOT QUITE WORTH WHAT I PAID FOR IT. IT IS A LITTLE BETTER THAN CATAGORY 6. SPECIAL EFFECTS WERE A LITTLE BIT BETTER, BUT I NOTICED THE SAME SHOTS AS WERE IN CATAGORY 6. THIS KIND OF RUINED IT. THE SPECIAL EFFECTS WERE BETTER, BUT STILL “CHEESY” BY TODAY’S STANDARDS LIKE THE NEWEST RELEASE OF KING KONG, WHICH BOASTS SOME AWESOME SPECIAL EFFECTS. I FEEL TWISTER HAS BETTER SPECIAL EFFECTS AS FAR AS TONADOES GO. THIS MOVIE DOES SHOW BETTER ACTING, AND A LITTLE MORE IN THE LINE OF NOTEWORTHY ACTORS LIKE ROBERT WAGONER, AND RANDY QUAID. IT’S A GOOD MOVIE, BUT FALLS SHORT OF “THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW”. I’VE SEEN THE PREVIEWS OF REMAKES OF THE CLASSIC DISASTER MOVIES, AND THEY LOOK INTERESTING. THIS MOVIE IS ENTERTAINING, AND IF YOU ARE A DISASTER FLICK FAN, GO FOR IT!!!
Rating: 3 / 5

]]> By: Daniel B. Yoe http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/category-7-the-end-of-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-72 Daniel B. Yoe Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:58:29 +0000 http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/category-7-the-end-of-the-world/#comment-72 I'll preface my review by saying that I generally like to indulge in the fantasy of disaster films. Without doubt, though, this is the worst movie I have ever attempted to watch. After watching the first fifteen minutes I assumed it was going to be a comedy or a spoof and sat in stunned amazement for another 20 minutes before getting the disc out of my player and throwing it in the trash. Besides the premise being laughably silly, the writing and acting are both deplorable. How do these things get made? It's unbelievable that a genuine producer actually read the script for this dog and decided to put money behind it. Imagine Al Gore and George Soros coming up with the most preposterous weather-related doomsday idea they could dream up, teaming up with the worst screenplay writer in the history of Hollywood, then recruiting the least skilled actors they could find in the unemployment line, putting them all together and adding some computerized special effects after directing the production themselves and you have Category 7. Movies this bad should come with a warning label that says "take a good whiff before buying". Horrible, just horrible. Rating: 1 / 5 I’ll preface my review by saying that I generally like to indulge in the fantasy of disaster films. Without doubt, though, this is the worst movie I have ever attempted to watch. After watching the first fifteen minutes I assumed it was going to be a comedy or a spoof and sat in stunned amazement for another 20 minutes before getting the disc out of my player and throwing it in the trash. Besides the premise being laughably silly, the writing and acting are both deplorable. How do these things get made? It’s unbelievable that a genuine producer actually read the script for this dog and decided to put money behind it. Imagine Al Gore and George Soros coming up with the most preposterous weather-related doomsday idea they could dream up, teaming up with the worst screenplay writer in the history of Hollywood, then recruiting the least skilled actors they could find in the unemployment line, putting them all together and adding some computerized special effects after directing the production themselves and you have Category 7. Movies this bad should come with a warning label that says “take a good whiff before buying”. Horrible, just horrible.
Rating: 1 / 5

]]> By: J. Dalton http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/category-7-the-end-of-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-71 J. Dalton Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:11:53 +0000 http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/category-7-the-end-of-the-world/#comment-71 This movie is absolutely PURE GARBAGE. Horrible in every respect. Do not waste your money on this and certainly do not waste your time on this joke of a movie. The idea that the thermal footprint of a city can reach the mesosphere is hilarious. Not only is the plot completely stupid, but the acting is some of the worst I've seen. <br />And, who was the spastic camera man? Terrible, terrible, terrible!!! I am giving a one star rating only because I cannot give it a zero or for that matter a negative 5. Rating: 1 / 5 This movie is absolutely PURE GARBAGE. Horrible in every respect. Do not waste your money on this and certainly do not waste your time on this joke of a movie. The idea that the thermal footprint of a city can reach the mesosphere is hilarious. Not only is the plot completely stupid, but the acting is some of the worst I’ve seen.

And, who was the spastic camera man? Terrible, terrible, terrible!!! I am giving a one star rating only because I cannot give it a zero or for that matter a negative 5.
Rating: 1 / 5

]]> By: Darren J. Peel http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/category-7-the-end-of-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-70 Darren J. Peel Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:10:56 +0000 http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/category-7-the-end-of-the-world/#comment-70 Again, this was purchased as a present so can't say if it's good or bad. <br /> <br />Category 7: The End of the World Rating: 3 / 5 Again, this was purchased as a present so can’t say if it’s good or bad.

Category 7: The End of the World
Rating: 3 / 5

]]>