<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Until the End of the World &#8211; 3-DVD Box Set</title>
	<atom:link href="http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/until-the-end-of-the-world-3-dvd-box-set/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/until-the-end-of-the-world-3-dvd-box-set/</link>
	<description>2012, December 21 2012, Natural Disasters News, 2012 End Of The World, 2012 Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 01:11:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gary Fox</title>
		<link>http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/until-the-end-of-the-world-3-dvd-box-set/comment-page-1/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/until-the-end-of-the-world-3-dvd-box-set/#comment-319</guid>
		<description>Hmmmmmm I am really tired of professional critics! None of them got the sense and idea of this movie at all. What we saw in 1991 release, was almost as far as I am concrened exactly what we may just get in the by 1999  and beyond. Sony just released a Vid Phone, Duhhhhhhhh I am sure it  wouldn&#039;t be hard to get it hooked up by wireless internet, Duhhhhhh Well as  much as the producer knew in 1991 about the future, they came as close as  possible as anyone else. Today we do have a majority of the technology  displayed in the movie.  If anyone deserves to take credit for inventing  the internet, it is these guys. I think, the movie is really a rememberance  of what happened to each character rather than a third person version, as  noticed by the end of the movie.   We remember in levels of excitement and  suffering, so that is how this movie was constructed.
Rating: 4 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmmmm I am really tired of professional critics! None of them got the sense and idea of this movie at all. What we saw in 1991 release, was almost as far as I am concrened exactly what we may just get in the by 1999  and beyond. Sony just released a Vid Phone, Duhhhhhhhh I am sure it  wouldn&#8217;t be hard to get it hooked up by wireless internet, Duhhhhhh Well as  much as the producer knew in 1991 about the future, they came as close as  possible as anyone else. Today we do have a majority of the technology  displayed in the movie.  If anyone deserves to take credit for inventing  the internet, it is these guys. I think, the movie is really a rememberance  of what happened to each character rather than a third person version, as  noticed by the end of the movie.   We remember in levels of excitement and  suffering, so that is how this movie was constructed.<br />
Rating: 4 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bux</title>
		<link>http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/until-the-end-of-the-world-3-dvd-box-set/comment-page-1/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>Bux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 19:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/until-the-end-of-the-world-3-dvd-box-set/#comment-318</guid>
		<description>I bought this movie at a place in city. I watched it. And it didn&#039;t went up to my expectetions. First, I think Wim Wenders did put this movie too close to his own time. He did not consider research what would happen until the real 1999. And what was that thing about the atomic satellite? It wasn&#039;t mentioned so much in the movie. You can see that the Soviet Union is actually still intact, even though it ceased to exist the coming year. Secondary, much of the picture was too much centered on Clarie (Solveig Dommartin). You do not get to see the plot real close. And what IS the plot? A man who invent a machine that can record real life and insert it&#039;s memories into another human, and the US govenment trying to find it? For their own purposes? I recommend seing Blade Runner if you want to see a future thriler/sci-fi.&lt;br&gt;Mind that this is MY rating for this movie, and should not be taken seriously. Thank You.
Rating: 2 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought this movie at a place in city. I watched it. And it didn&#8217;t went up to my expectetions. First, I think Wim Wenders did put this movie too close to his own time. He did not consider research what would happen until the real 1999. And what was that thing about the atomic satellite? It wasn&#8217;t mentioned so much in the movie. You can see that the Soviet Union is actually still intact, even though it ceased to exist the coming year. Secondary, much of the picture was too much centered on Clarie (Solveig Dommartin). You do not get to see the plot real close. And what IS the plot? A man who invent a machine that can record real life and insert it&#8217;s memories into another human, and the US govenment trying to find it? For their own purposes? I recommend seing Blade Runner if you want to see a future thriler/sci-fi.<br />Mind that this is MY rating for this movie, and should not be taken seriously. Thank You.<br />
Rating: 2 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gonn1000</title>
		<link>http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/until-the-end-of-the-world-3-dvd-box-set/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>gonn1000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/until-the-end-of-the-world-3-dvd-box-set/#comment-317</guid>
		<description>This futuristic, post-apocalyptic thriller/ comedy/ romance tries to deliver some clever ideas about the power of dreams, memory and its manipulation and control. One should always praise a film that dares to raise thought-provoking questions, yet in this case I can`t help but give it one star. Despite the gripping premise, this movie is too long, unfocused, slow and disjointed to deserve a higher rating. Director Wim Wenders has an interesting concept, still he seems uncomfortable with the material here and the result is a failed attempt. The plot is contrived at best, the characters` motivations and attitudes don`t make much sense and the story truly is a test to one`s patiente and good-will. Ok, so the soundtrack is alright and the directing is competent, but that`s it. Maybe a remake could give a better life to this concept, since this effort is pretentious, incredibly boring and seems unfinishable. It just drags endlessly.&lt;br&gt;One to skip.
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This futuristic, post-apocalyptic thriller/ comedy/ romance tries to deliver some clever ideas about the power of dreams, memory and its manipulation and control. One should always praise a film that dares to raise thought-provoking questions, yet in this case I can`t help but give it one star. Despite the gripping premise, this movie is too long, unfocused, slow and disjointed to deserve a higher rating. Director Wim Wenders has an interesting concept, still he seems uncomfortable with the material here and the result is a failed attempt. The plot is contrived at best, the characters` motivations and attitudes don`t make much sense and the story truly is a test to one`s patiente and good-will. Ok, so the soundtrack is alright and the directing is competent, but that`s it. Maybe a remake could give a better life to this concept, since this effort is pretentious, incredibly boring and seems unfinishable. It just drags endlessly.<br />One to skip.<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsrussell</title>
		<link>http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/until-the-end-of-the-world-3-dvd-box-set/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>dsrussell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/until-the-end-of-the-world-3-dvd-box-set/#comment-316</guid>
		<description>Obviously, my review won&#039;t be very popular here.  So be it.&lt;p&gt;I was looking for a unique film that I hadn&#039;t seen before, and from the glowing 5-star reviews throughout this page I thought this would be such a film.   Unfortunately, it doesn&#039;t even come close.  Long and boring with improbable  (no, impossible...no, incredulous) situations, this mess never made me care  for any of the characters, especially the two lead characters.  Did I  mention that it was loooonnnnnggggg? &lt;p&gt;To say that this isn&#039;t my type of  movie would be a gross understatement.  Everything, and I mean everything,  seemed contrived to the point of being ridiculous.  As the title indicates,  this story is based upon everyones&#039; fear of impending doom as a nuclear  platform&#039;s orbit decays.  Funny thing is, except for the narrator stating  this on several occasions, no one in the film really seemed to care one way  or another (nor did I, since it wouldn&#039;t detonate the nuclear warheads  anyway).  Add to that, the impossible crossing of paths of cardboard  characters, and one is left with nothing but a jumbled mess.  How probable  is the following?:&lt;p&gt;1.  Two cars crash on an empty, open road (going in  the same direction, no less) and immediately the occupants become so  friendly that they trust each other and an oddball woman with millions of  dollars of stolen loot.&lt;p&gt;2.  Two strangers meet at a line of telephones  and there is immediate attraction...to the point that the female follows  this guy all over the world (this is where the travel log comes in).&lt;p&gt;3.   Two of the characters are hunting the protagonist (bounty hunters?), but  both are so comedic that the viewer feels absolutely no threat from either  of them (actually, I was hoping they would kill the protagonist, but  alas...).&lt;p&gt;4.  The future (uh, 1999) looks like 60&#039;s plastic  art-deco.&lt;p&gt;5.  The continuous narration was as mindless as the film.&lt;p&gt;I  could go on and on, but this film doesn&#039;t merit any more wasted time.  The  only positive note is that some of the locals were quite nice, and Max von  Sydow is always solid.  If you want to see this film because of all the  positive reviews, I suggest that you rent it first.  Between 1 and 10,  &quot;Until the End of the World&quot; gets a marginal 3.&lt;p&gt;I understand that the VHS  version I purchased was a shortened version (hard to believe), and because  of this the plot lines may have become jumbled, but in all honesty, I don&#039;t  think adding more minutes to this movie could possibly help it.
Rating: 2 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously, my review won&#8217;t be very popular here.  So be it.
<p>I was looking for a unique film that I hadn&#8217;t seen before, and from the glowing 5-star reviews throughout this page I thought this would be such a film.   Unfortunately, it doesn&#8217;t even come close.  Long and boring with improbable  (no, impossible&#8230;no, incredulous) situations, this mess never made me care  for any of the characters, especially the two lead characters.  Did I  mention that it was loooonnnnnggggg? </p>
<p>To say that this isn&#8217;t my type of  movie would be a gross understatement.  Everything, and I mean everything,  seemed contrived to the point of being ridiculous.  As the title indicates,  this story is based upon everyones&#8217; fear of impending doom as a nuclear  platform&#8217;s orbit decays.  Funny thing is, except for the narrator stating  this on several occasions, no one in the film really seemed to care one way  or another (nor did I, since it wouldn&#8217;t detonate the nuclear warheads  anyway).  Add to that, the impossible crossing of paths of cardboard  characters, and one is left with nothing but a jumbled mess.  How probable  is the following?:</p>
<p>1.  Two cars crash on an empty, open road (going in  the same direction, no less) and immediately the occupants become so  friendly that they trust each other and an oddball woman with millions of  dollars of stolen loot.</p>
<p>2.  Two strangers meet at a line of telephones  and there is immediate attraction&#8230;to the point that the female follows  this guy all over the world (this is where the travel log comes in).</p>
<p>3.   Two of the characters are hunting the protagonist (bounty hunters?), but  both are so comedic that the viewer feels absolutely no threat from either  of them (actually, I was hoping they would kill the protagonist, but  alas&#8230;).</p>
<p>4.  The future (uh, 1999) looks like 60&#8217;s plastic  art-deco.</p>
<p>5.  The continuous narration was as mindless as the film.</p>
<p>I  could go on and on, but this film doesn&#8217;t merit any more wasted time.  The  only positive note is that some of the locals were quite nice, and Max von  Sydow is always solid.  If you want to see this film because of all the  positive reviews, I suggest that you rent it first.  Between 1 and 10,  &#8220;Until the End of the World&#8221; gets a marginal 3.</p>
<p>I understand that the VHS  version I purchased was a shortened version (hard to believe), and because  of this the plot lines may have become jumbled, but in all honesty, I don&#8217;t  think adding more minutes to this movie could possibly help it.<br />
Rating: 2 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/until-the-end-of-the-world-3-dvd-box-set/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2012naturaldisasters.com/2012NaturalDisasters/until-the-end-of-the-world-3-dvd-box-set/#comment-315</guid>
		<description>Bought this movie based on current reviews.  Watch it, Long, Slow, not very good much less great.  I guess you have to just&lt;br&gt;disregard the reviews.
Rating: 2 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bought this movie based on current reviews.  Watch it, Long, Slow, not very good much less great.  I guess you have to just<br />disregard the reviews.<br />
Rating: 2 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
